As someone with 0 tattoos but who wants tattoos, I think the bar for those kinds of tats is if the moments you’re signifying through the tattoo have truly defined or been a significant part of your life. I think even though we all change, it’s fine to acknowledge what’s happened in our past in an artistic manner on our bodies. For instance, I learned English playing Zelda & other video games, I’ve played them for decades, so I would consider a tattoo of Nintendo IP, even though I want nothing more than for the entire company to spontaneously combust. My love for the Zelda IP is bigger than my hate for Nintendo, and I have no qualms holding both feelings at once. Such hatred, at least for me, stems from them butchering our childhood memories, after all.
The style of the tattoo might be harder to nail for me, because sure I might want a Legend of Zelda tattoo or something, but I could make something classy and timeless or I could make the worst recreation of AI marketing hallucination content imaginable and regret the ink as it gets injected into me. If I have no taste, I could very quickly regret my tattoo… And that’s why I still have no tats. I’ve seen how I make bases & houses in video games, I don’t trust my artistic choices.







The argument presented for not lowering the flag seems solid enough to accept and move on, but only when applied fair and square for all scenarios. If other figures that don’t come anywhere even close to Dolly Parton’s legendary status HAVE gotten the flag lowered for them, then the very sound argument is actually just two-faced bullshit. I don’t see how that’s a hard concept to grasp.