A whole bunch of assumptions with nothing to back it up, like a true racist.

Bad faith replays to bad faith replays seems fair to me.

You are arguing points I didn’t make so how am I supposed to take this serious?

Like “It’s not racist to predict behavior based on whether said people self-identity themselves as members of those cultures.”

What the fuck are you rambling on about? :D

My point was that it feels racist to take a group/race/nationality/gender/sex/whatever and then say that those people in that group act all the same.

That is the mechanism of racism so it feels racist. And then one person said that it is not racist at all because it is not about race, it is about culture.

As if the mechanism and result differ because its another group :D

And then it turns out that it is called “cultural racism” because it is sooooo different from racism xD

I also said that racism can come from a “positive” place. Like the Asian example. Which is still bad and racist. Some Asians aren’t good at math and their hate that people expect it from them.

Those were my arguments. The second Post in this comment chain and no one following was capable of engaging with that. Instead theiy did what you are acusing me of right now^^

It’s a clownshow, I treat it as such.

Being German is genetics, like being black.

Not even new-yorkes? Then they are not really that stand offish, aren’t they?

But is is okay to judge people by the color of their flag?

So it is so similar to racism that people call it cultural racism.

So when I say “all black people are thieves”, that is racist.

So when I say “all Germans are thieves”…if it is not racist, what is it?

Because we reduce a population made of individuals to anecdotal evidence.

“People from there are like this” is just a problematic way of thinking.

Even if it is positive. Saying all Asians are good at math may seem positive, but it is racist because you imprint one attribute to a whole group and rob people of their individuality.

It’s racist 🤷

I feel this is racist.

Speak every language because that includes animals.

djin gets visibly angry

It was the fault of the butterfly who flapped its wings.

The name of the butterfly?

Edit: this is a joke.

Nah, you’re good.

Not saying they archived it. Just that they go in that direction.

Edit: I am talking about the textures for stone walls and the likes.

The style of the world and the Pokémon/character doesn’t mesh well.

Why go for detailed realism if simple cartoon would be a better choice?

Sometimes people store simple data, like a boolean, in it.

When I tried to make a website with some funny functions everything I read said to store data in cookies.

And I feel like a Xbox.

What happened?

I think the reason is our futile yearning for safety.

People look for patterns so they can fool themselves into thinking they are prepared. They know this group so they know what to expect.

Bullshit, of course.

People are complex, life is dangerous, face your anger and see it is just fear.

It is because people are different.

I agree with you that it is useful in the context of finding information.

But the way people use them seems more like a prison then a guideline.

Is it though? How?

I don’t get why labels are so important to people.

If other people label you, they think you have to act a certain way.

If you label yourself, you think you have to act a certain way.

“I like what I like” why does it have to be more complicated than that?

Why censor the name?