I do understand that, it just seems like bringing up a random fact that has no bearing on the actual discussion and seems like it’s missing some additional context to actually be funny.

But, again, totally accepting that I’m the one it’s just not clicking with :)

Thanks for trying though, my skull must just be too thick!

I’m whooshing pretty hard because I still don’t understand what the joke is, but I’ll just assume that’s on me :)

Thanks for trying to help me understand!

What does that have to do with a situation that’s not in France?

Cool

Have you done actual research or are you assuming because it feels right, it must be?

Yes, I did read the comments.

Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.

An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.

If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.

I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.

How does it result in that?

Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.

Goalposts

ANEN aND THANK YOU TO THW TROOPEE 4 there SERVICE!

Your message reads kinda douchey.

I believe it’s assuming you’re not taking breaks, in which case I think they’re a bit more reasonable is expected walking speed but perhaps less reasonable in regards to a persons ability to go without sleeping :)