Bloody Mary garnish.

Yeah. Just embarrassed to have lost a joust against a stationary forklift.

I hit it head on. My brain was like “We’re sitting down. Now.” And it raised a welt that took like a week to go away.

I wasn’t watching where I was going and walked forehead first into the carpet boom of the forklift I had parked. Shouldn’t have parked it with the boom that high, and should have been watching where I was going. Not my proudest moment.

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.

In most cases oath and affirmation are legally interchangeable. You can affirm that you are telling the truth without swearing an oath.

I would imagine that if you went deaf after you learned to read, rhymes would continue to make sense.

Or even synthetic urine. If a drug test can’t tell the difference, it’s gonna be close enough to smell like you microwaved real piss.

Get it to like 103° at the gas station across the street,

This is gonna scare people who aren’t used to Fahrenheit.

That’s funny. I didn’t hear anyone holler “soooie!”

“Do it for shrooms.”

No I do not. I don’t think they support genocide either, but they do support a country committing genocide, which is absolutely disgusting too. But I’m perhaps splitting hairs there.

I make no distinction between the two, and I consider your hair splitting to be an attempt to downplay it.

Do you think they support a country committing genocide because people are voting for them?

I think they support genocide regardless of who voted for them. I think they do so for the sheer love of it. If you support genocide you lose the benefit of the doubt.

Do you suppose genocide has always been something Democrats were so eager to support?

I don’t think I made any claims that this was a fluke. If so, it wasn’t meant to be received as such. I’m merely saying that one election is not enough to go on.

And now that I’ve cited multiple elections, can we put that “we only have one election” thing to bed?

And I don’t know enough to make any claims about the history. I’m merely saying we have to look at the history to make any claims. This type of theorem can’t be based on one election. That’s all I’m saying.

How convenient that you only know one election when I bring up the previous two cycles of the phenomenon I described, but up until this moment, you were certain that this one election was a fluke.

For one election?

Which of GWB’s rightward policies did Obama undo? Which of Reagan/Bush’s policies did Clinton undo?

You’re defending a rightward shift that has been going on for decades.

Does the rightward shift that has resulted in the “good” party supporting genocide indicate stability to you?

Welp, you just saw that “damage control” has a limit. People will stay home if they see insufficient difference between the two pro-genocide parties.

Sorry, I thought I made it clear. What Biden did when he supported genocide for you is not “damage control” even though you love him for it.

and the Biden administration did more to restrict sales than most

Oh? Provide examples.