Pretty confident you’re wearing rose tinted glasses. They had very few ads in the beginning. you could get through multiple episodes without getting them but they definitely existed. Maybe you had an ad blocker? I literally can’t find any evidence it was ever both and I was using it within the first few months of it’s public release

I’m pretty sure it was never free and without ads. There were much fewer and even sometimes would have really quick “thanks for watching now get back to the show” ads but ad free has always been paid

Lmao yes, telling you to feel bad for non tech workers in the bay area makes me libertarian

Yeah I don’t get it. You can also work for established companies where you get steady income instead of volatile stocks but you’re not going to be able to retire super early with a work life balance that way

might

Yeah it’s risky. People do it multiple times though and one success pays out. It’s a risky choice that I wouldn’t make but I understand why people do

That’s startup life. Dude might be rolling in it in a couple years and it’s a decision. Feel bad for the non tech workers around the bay

You understand that doesn’t contradict my point in any way right?

Maybe, but they’re not helping Republicans as much as people like you

The comic is only accurate if you expect it do everything for you, you’re bad at communicating, and you’re using an old model. Or if you’re just unlucky

Good discussion

She’s locking the door. There’s more implication than failing to sell sex to women there

Where does it say that only single men commit rape

You mean the punchline?

Don’t link to x. Take a screenshot and post it please

And your car or flight is a massive strain on the environment. I think you’re missing the point. There’s a way to use tools responsibly. We’ve taken the chains off and that’s obviously a problem but the AI hate here is irrational

They factually are. ML is AI. I think you mean AGI maybe?

Uh dismissing that concern seems like valid point? Do people have to comprehensively discredit the whole list to reply?

I’m saying it because I’ve seen them make the same argument, as I have done myself, in different ways.

I’m saying it because I’ve seen them make the same argument, as I have done myself, in different ways.

Then maybe you didn’t read the conversation

My point is that being “anti-authoritarian” is meaningless unless

That seems to be your new point and again I don’t care to argue what a “true about authoritarian” is. If you think me wanting the ss to have been executed after the Holocaust disqualifies me as anti authoritarian you’re welcome to think that, I don’t respect your opinion in that case. That was the conversation where you entered.

Their argument is that I’m not anti authoritarian. Afaict you’re not making that argument. I’m not interested in fighting about what is or isn’t a true Scotsman. This devolves quickly into if you believe in the government having any power, that’s an endorsement of authoritarianism and now no one can be anti authoritarian if they believe in any kind of enforceable law.