Scratch

Perfect answer.

I thought that it was canon that China used brand new stealth tech to bomb the us back to the stone age.

Sqwell

Yes.

Unless you can show that your behaviour was endorsed by someone with the authority to endorse it, and you would reasonably not know it was not appropriate behaviour. Then you get into actual defence.

But in the OP it was admitted

Yes.

Since the it wasn’t your manager that gave you the go ahead, you can’t use it as a shield. All you’ll do is make it seem like you’ll tell on people to get out of trouble.

And since telling on a coworker won’t get you out of trouble, don’t bother.

Say nothing.

HR is not on your side, they’re not looking for justice or fairness or anything.

Don’t rat on coworkers.

“I don’t recall.” Is a complete and very useful sentence.

Sure, start there.

Then start writing letters to representatives.
Then start helping with the campaign of candidates you support.
Then get promoted through the ranks of the org.
Then get an appointment when your candidate wins.
Then take bribes from massive corps!

It’s win/win!

Frierien; Beyond Journeys End

It’s about the mage from the Party of Heroes. 80 years ago they defeated the Demon King and shattered his armies, restoring peace to most of the world.

Frierien is an elf who has lived for hundreds of years and the rest of the party are dying of old age.

The show follows her as she learns to open up to people, even though she knows those people will only live for a small fraction of her lifespan, and what it’s like to live in the world she helped save now that people are starting to forget she did.

It knocked Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood off the top spot on MyAnimeList after (something like) 13 years of dominance.

It’s excellent, though some find it a little slow in parts. (I think that’s fitting for a story about an immortal)

If they want to, yes.

Ban anyone for coercing someone into or out of clothing.

Granted, I haven’t put a major amount of thought into the nuance, but the idea of making it a sin for some people to legally go outside is absurd.

The approach of these laws makes it so the victims of mistreatment are the ones breaking the law.

It’s like making it illegal to be homeless or illegal to have been mugged. It’s fucking outlandish.

“I can’t go outside without wearing a head covering.”

“Head coverings are now illegal.”

“Now I can’t go outside.”

This makes the world more fair and equitable.

Here’s a wild idea, instead of making clothing illegal, why don’t we make coercing people into a manner of dress illegal?

Shinji!
Get in the robot with your mother!

Contact was fine. And fun! Specifically the DayZ side was a bit sketchy.

They fucked around with DayZ pretty good.

• Glacial progress for a long, long time.
• Releasing the Livonia DLC for a half-made game. That pissed me off real nice. (And I’m a guy who bought the Supporter Edition of Arma 3)

To be fair, they have acted well since then. So my hackles have settled down.

“Yes we’ve made life harder, especially for the elderly and pregnant. But you must understand we needed to impart more misery on the homeless!”

“Hey, can we give each homeless person $2000? It’ll pull 90% of them out of poverty. Then they’ll become contributors to the tax pool!”

“No, I’d rather spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on hostile architecture and hostile police. Also we pay jails to house and feed them.”

You could also class it as a debt in your name.
I’ve paid my debts.
I’ve paid my taxes.

You shouldn’t be able to, because both lanes are full and moving at half speed.

Came here to find this argument.

Well done everyone!