• 1 Post
  • 70 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle







  • CommanderCloon@lemmy.mltoComic Strips@lemmy.worldBecky
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This sentence made no sense to me as it directly contradicted the previous one. But it’s just a confusion on my part between the function called square root, which confusingly outputs two different numbers called “square roots”, and “the” number called square root; I’ve edited my comment. Thanks for correcting me!


  • CommanderCloon@lemmy.mltoComic Strips@lemmy.worldBecky
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No?

    In mathematics, a square root of a number x is a number y such that y² = x; in other words, a number y whose square (the result of multiplying the number by itself, or y ⋅ y) is x. For example, 4 and −4 are square roots of 16 because 4² = ( − 4 )² = 16.

    Wikipedia


    Edit: I’m wrong lol, there is a difference between the square root function, which accepts two results, and the square root, or principal square root, which is a unique positive number


  • CommanderCloon@lemmy.mltoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThe Divine Dick
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s not more heretical to claim that jesus wasn’t entirely human, quite the opposite in fact. It’s a very old theological debate of homoousianism vs heteroousianism vs homoiousianism (same substance, different substance, similar substance). This debate was settled in the 4th century and Arianism (heteroousianism) was rejected

    Homoousianism - god the father is of the same substance as Christ, is the most prevalent vision nowadays, which means that christ is purely divine and not human