The definition of dictators is very much flexible and politically charged. We decide someone is a “piece of shit” and after that, we call them dictators. By instance, when the Taliban where CIA assets, they where not called dictators, but freedom fighters and where glorified in Rambo III.
I would never drink a milk that lasts two weeks. Real food spoils. This must be some liquid plastic.
One liter (0.26 gl) bottles or boxes.
What is relevant: “for its own commercial purposes. In that regard, the general terms and conditions of use of that marketplace give Russmedia considerable freedom to exploit the information published on that marketplace.”
This turns the marketplace in a business that must have responsibilities and duty to care because they not only host the content, but process it.
Hosting is defined on paragraph 6. It does not involve processing of information. You user hit publish, it is published without any processing and and you don’t claim right to “use published content, distribute it, transmit it, reproduce it, modify it, translate it, transfer it to partners and remove it at any time, without the need for any ‘valid’ reason for so doing.”.
The GDPR don’t claim you are responsible for merely hosting personal information, but you become responsible by processing it. “The processing of personal data should be designed to serve mankind.”
The point is: you can run a lemmy instance, have people publishing shitposts all day in a hands off moderation policy. One day someone posts a doxxing. As soon you are told, you delete and it’s OK. But you can’t run a business where you invite people to post doxxing information, you claim rights to distribute this information, and them say you are only hosting it, and not processing it.
The problem is the site want the cake (free harbour immunity) and eat it (gain rights to profit from the published content).
Not really. The decision only states that a service that allows to publish advertisements with personal information must review these and make sure it’s they have the consent. Something all “gone wild” subreddits do with volunteers. A company that runs advertisements should be able to.
A company that publishes ads for sexual services without getting confirmation of consent is a risk for the society and this business model should not be allowed.
And extra large magazines. You can find glock magazines with 50 or 100 bullets.
If your sd card dies, just use a real ssd, sata or nvme.
It’s not serverless, of course. Each peer is a server and the peer that created the “sub” have control to be able to moderate things. You have to maintain your peer always online, because it’s a server. Traffic happens over IPFS, which is sloooooow.
ActivityPub is not perfect, but this is just a channer wanting some freeze prach space he can control.
Writefreely is alive. Plume not.
If you don’t have strong privacy concerns, you can use the free tier vps from oracle cloud or Google cloud. They are small, but are more than enough for this load.
Reading the white paper you find the “serverless” has servers. Each community needs to be always online to serve captchas to posters. The system is federated on community level, instead of instance level, and uses DHT instead of DNS.
Authentication bypass should give you interactive access. “I’m in” like. Remote code execution only allows you to run a command, without permanent access. You can use some RCE vulnerabilities to bypass authentication, but not all.
https://hacdias.com/2026/03/11/filebrowser/