• 1 Post
  • 391 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle





  • Because the development of new Smartphone SOC has been very strong, and the new ones really are better in multiple ways. The gains are far from minimal. There are also huge improvements in display, camera and modem technology. For the processing power the improvements are especially big when you look at PPW figures.

    Regarding cheap phones, you can get very feature rich very usable smartphones dirt cheap now, that are both way better and way cheaper than just a few years ago. It used to be that cheap phones lacked features like GPS and NFS, even motion sensors could be limited, and they certainly didn’t have bluetooth. Now all that is generally included even in cheap phones, and they have good screens too, even a modest IPS screen which is dirt cheap can be pretty good nowadays. So the progress is for all.

    My wife just bought a phone that was cheaper than her old phone, but still it’s is way better.

    The reason they all make better phones is due to this thing we call competition. If all brands except one stopped making better phones, the one that continues making them better will take marketshare from everybody else, and have by far the best profits, because the highest profits are with the best phones.

    PS: Something that is also new in “standard” phones is that they have way better water protection. It used to be you would have to buy an ugly bulky phone to have that, now you can get standard phones with good IPS ratings, so you don’t have to worry about using them in the rain.

    Contrary to you, I find the continued development of better phones amazing. Latest phone I bought was twice what I thought I’d ever spend, and that was because I wanted a good camera. The new Cameras are so freaking great, that if you ever tried taking pictures with an old film camera, that needed the film developed at a shop to get them on paper.
    What we have now is way beyond what I ever imagined possible, but really so is just about everything with a modern smartphone.
    They really are marvels of technology that some people just take for granted.
    But research the SOC, The Camera, GPS or the motion sensors, even a modest motion sensor utilize quantum theory technology, comparing the synchronization of 2 meeting light waves, and the feature cost less than a dollar to make!

    This is what the future was supposed to be, unfortunately only smartphones have delivered beyond our dreams, everything else is turning to shit.


  • But we’re pre-dating the common distro hopping discussions

    No we aren’t, Linux fora were full of them even before Ubuntu more than 20 years ago. Debian, Suse, Fedora, Mandrake, Mepis, PCLinux.
    Distro hopping was always a thing people debated.

    The rest of that sentence is a bit confusing, who are we? And how am I supposed to read minds? And going back was kind of where we started, because you claimed it was a new thing for Debian. Debian was definitely recommended to general users, for many good reasons. Stability and huge repository among them, but also user friendly install procedure, and good package manager, that handled dependencies way better than Suse and Fedora.



  • Good summary. 👍

    Debian. I do see Debian mentioned now a lot more than it has been in years.

    I haven’t noticed much difference, Debian has always been the go to distro if you wanted reliability and repositories that cover almost everything. Debian has always been an excellent choice for productivity. It’s not by accident that Debian for more than 20 years has been the distro with by far the most derivatives.

    By that standard Arch is the only distro that has achieved something similar, and it may be somewhat telling that SteamOS switched from Debian based to Arch based. Arch is way smaller in scope, and more nimble and easier to maintain. But AFAIK they do not have the democratic process Debian has, so I’m not sure it can really be called community based distro like Debian. Arch has more of a top leadership.
    Debian is probably the most true to the Free and Open Source ideals among the big distros.


  • Why is it rong to forgive the one you love ?

    Whoever you were unfaithful with probably hadn’t promised your boyfriend anything, so definitely it’s irrational to blame “the other guy”.
    If you had agreed to be in a monogamous relationship, you broke that agreement, and for most people that’s a very serious thing.
    I do not however buy into your claim that this issue is something men care about more than woman. On the contrary women are generally the ones complaining about potentially unfaithful men, and I’ve heard many women generalize that men are often unfaithful, to a degree one would think that is much more common. But statistics clearly indicate that since there are more men than women, chances are that on average, women are more frequently unfaithful than men.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle


  • No you can’t sous vide at body temperature. red meat needs 60 °C (130 to 140 °F).
    Body temperature is only about 37°.
    Try to warm some water to 60° C and put your finger in it, and see how long you can hold it there.
    Or maybe don’t because you will get burned.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sous_vide

    If your question is how we can tolerate higher temperatures than our body temperature, even up to 60° C, the answer is body cooling. As mentioned by others, cooling by evaporating sweat (water) from the surface of our skin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_index

    If you look at the table, you can only tolerate up to for instance 43° C at 40% humidity. At that point there is extreme danger.
    The more dry the air is, the higher temperature can be tolerated, because the sweat evaporates faster so you cool faster.

    So at 90% humidity cooling is very slow, so you can only tolerate up to 33° C. Which is about 4° C below body temperature. But the heat you generate internally makes you heat up to above tolerable body temperature, and if prolonged you will die.







  • AFAIK it’s not uncommon for a small upstart company for instance, to rely on friends, because friendship helps working together.
    I know it can smell a bit like nepotism, and we know that’s bad.
    But there are actual good reasons people prefer to work with people they know. So I think it will be just fine, as long as you are not fighting over the same girl. And as long as you are not trying to exploit the friendship to gain advantages at work.