I love it.

Little miss what?

But what is hobby horsing called - is it “horsing” or “hobby horsing”?

I don’t really get it…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobby_horsing

And what’s the ai stuff in your comment supposed to mean?

Sounds like it kinda could have been better, too…

Screens nowadays have anti-reflective coatings to make the brightness of a reflection far, far less than the actual light source if you looked directly at it.

So… You say you need a matte screen for the increased brightness to work?

Not here.

Nothing says “family” like eating alone in your room, huh?

You do.

/edit Just scrolled further down and saw the picture of the kitchen table. I take that back, it’s not you but the place is indeed disgusting as fuck and you have my sincere sympathies.

And you saw yourself in relation to it all?

Ford Prefect, I presume?

Screaming feed me here

I’m so looking forward to it.

Don’t forget to add a “package management” service that at first glance makes importing XMLlamascript modules super easy but at second glance takes down the Internet after you piss off a random maintainer before then turning into a malware distribution engine.

Then maybe you should go ahead and write a brutally messed up but somehow ubiquitous scripting language that just somehow has its object instanciations look exactly like xml so those files can be imported right into scripts that then somehow turn into full blown server applications so xml gets the same attention as Json.

Is that a special case of state spaces?

Of course it can. Just the same way I can refer to a table as “fish”: by being wrong.

What? No, it doesn’t. People in that context is singular and means population of a country, so peoples is the proper plural for two of those. There’s no superior plural that means “that plural but, like, even more of that”. Otherwise you would end up with libraries that are filled with aisles that are just filled with shelves full of theses being called theseseseses.

From that article:

Graphic screen-printing is widely used today to create mass- or large-batch produced graphics, such as posters or display stands. Full colour prints can be created by printing in CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow and black).

It’s still subtractive.

Would you be so kind to point me to the position in the article that explains how they use rgb? Because the images I came across there seemed to indicate otherwise.

Hey dude, is everything okay? It’s just the Internet and just a discussion about printing and colours.

You don’t use rgb in print.