wiki-user: Aatube
Now mostly on @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org . I use this account as a backup.
Some context about Bild: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lost_Honour_of_Katharina_Blum
I personally haven’t seen this extremely, extremely questionable ownership affect their (non-opinion news) writing though, unlike Murdoch and WSJ. So I won’t rely on it but I won’t question them until they publish weird stuff yet either.
he even conceded:
In a surprisingly early and gracious concession speech in Budapest, Mr. Orban congratulated the opposition saying, “The responsibility and opportunity to govern were not given to us.” But, he also made a vow: “We are not giving up. Never, never, never.”
not to mention Apple Education sells it for $500
when it comes to making aggressive assumptions about what you read, it is your responsibility to pull yourself up by the glasses.
in this case, a certain person clearly mentioned not having finished the NHS’s wait time.
or, perhaps, they wanted to show you a different perspective you do not know without aggression
setting aside that not all kinds of adhd are treatable, if you read his post again, you’ll see the current external obstacle to his treatment.
i like them because they’re immediately understandable in everyday spoken conversation and i used to trigger more people by saying “they’s” (“they is”)
you do realize he mentions ADHD? i’m sure you don’t mean to but your comment implies the mentally ill can just pull themselves up by their bootstraps
i believe cravings can make one obese even if ze only selects foods that ze can make in zir own kitchen
I didn’t say that it should be part of the OS. You’re repeating a different (compelling) argument that doesn’t change whether this field is opt-out when this entire subthread is about whether these fields are opt-out since kent_eh said the other fields were opt-out.
exactly, users should disable the optional birthDate field
Your point is true, but I’m saying its impact is also optional.
You specifically named the bills from Colorado and NY. They simply do not include those. https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-051 https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S8102/amendment/A I wholeheartedly believe my characterization of these bills are faithful.
Specifically due to how barebones it is, it is trivial to modify yourself the birthdate sent to applications, as long as you have the system password.
https://www.unihertz.com/products/jelly-star ? Its form factor sort of makes worrying about anything else impossible.
That is the purpose, but the field is implemented as optional and modifiable with admin privileges.
(same for the birthDate field)
I agree with you but repeating your arguments in mass replies does not make it stronger.
That’s the Minnesota bill. The PR does not comply with that. You can read on how to the California law and NY and Colorado bills basically say to give the user a drop-down to select their birth date.
I don’t see what’s wrong with implementing it as an add-on to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field as the PR in question does. It’s the most logical place as the location to store user information and is even easier to opt out of—you just edit a file—than choosing whether to compile Linux with/add to DKMS a kernel module.
Edit: One can see https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/8878df45c1a58afdfb500fdc53ec50e057a240ce/docs/USER_RECORD_BLOB_DIRS.md?plain=1#L103 for an example of a user record file and its path. Further documentation you can read at https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/8878df45c1a58afdfb500fdc53ec50e057a240ce/man/systemd-userdbd.service.xml#L36 and https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/8878df45c1a58afdfb500fdc53ec50e057a240ce/docs/USER_RECORD.md .
i don’t see what that graph’s supposed to show. replacing the businessmen was in the 90s and here it’s a basic trend starting from the 80s, plus emigration restrictions immediately relaxing
i’m more expectant since national minimums was part of the platform