ShinyLemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago

China Reportedly Advances to 5nm AI Chips as Domestic Firms Tape Out Two New Solutions For Model Training & AI PC Workloads

wccftech.com

external-link
message-square
16
link
fedilink
22
external-link

China Reportedly Advances to 5nm AI Chips as Domestic Firms Tape Out Two New Solutions For Model Training & AI PC Workloads

wccftech.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
16
link
fedilink
China is reportedly advancing towards 5nm AI GPUs, as a new report claims that domestic firms are set to tape out new chips.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If China’s already at 5nm, they’re getting close. Smallest in use now is 3nm, I think.

    This poses the question, how long until China can achieve its goals without Taiwan and TSMC?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine they will be able to produce bleeding edge chips within a year or two tops. What’s even more interesting though is that China is now producing chips on different substrates like gallium that don’t have any equivalents in the west. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3323448/luo-weiwei-former-nasa-scientist-who-became-chinas-semiconductor-trump-card

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk about 2 years, but they can definitely do it by 2030.

        It took TSMC a while to get to that point if I’m not mistaken, so even with all the financial might of the CCP, I still doubt it will happen THAT quickly.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, it’s hard to predict exact timing on these sort of things, so another 5 years is a plausible timeline. It does tend to be easier to do things the second time around. When you’re doing something from scratch then you don’t know what the right approach will be, you’re going to have false starts, and so on. When the general idea has been proven, it’s much easier to replicate because now you know what the general direction to pursue is.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • m532@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only reason I can see for china to invade china 2 is if usa places nukes there

        • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • m532@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you said the same as me, but framed like a cia stenographer would. Why tho? You gain something from convincing people that china bad?

            • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              deleted by creator

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always saw it as TSMC potentially being a key reason for China to invade Taiwan so they get their hands on semiconductors, with this being LESS likely now, instead of more, because China no longer needs TSMC and their research.

        • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because it is. They’ve also made it very clear that they intend to follow a path of peaceful unification and the only reason that hasn’t happened already is because of US meddling and military threats.

            • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              deleted by creator

              • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It seems you’re mostly right (except there are rumours that a Taiwan takeover is part of China’s long term plan for economic dominance).

                I’m worried at how many China shills there are around here.

                • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  deleted by creator

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t you have that backwards? Without TSMC’s outstanding technology, the island’s value decreases, both for China and for the USA. Conventional wisdom is that reduced tensions also reduces the risk of war.

        • Tenderizer78@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          deleted by creator

  • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The challenge more is that even if they can produce the chips, the machines they are using they can’t get parts for. EUV is still out of reach. Probably another 5-8 years.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kind of funny how you just confidently pull a number out of your ass here. On what basis do you think China is 5-8 years away from making their own EUV machines exactly?

      The reality is that China is already starting to experiment with their own EUV approaches. A lot of the complexity in ASML machines comes from the fact that they need to be compact enough to ship around the world. China is looking at the approach of using an accelerator instead.

      • https://www.tomshardware.com/news/china-aims-to-use-particle-accelerator-to-build-chips-and-evade-euv-sanctions
      • https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/china-developed-euv-lithography-could-trial-in-2025/
      • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been following this story for 5 years. There’s lots of hopey articles like this over that time. SMEE was supposed to release a 28-nm DUV machine last year in 2023, then 2024 summer, then 2024 December. To date no release. Most of these innovations by thr Chinese are academic discoveries that will take years further to productionize. Generally if the Chinese say they will do something new-technology-wise next year, it will happen 2-5 years after when they say it will.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find that generally we tend to see tech progress in China outpace predictions. For example, nobody expected China to start producing 7 and 5nm chips by now, nobody thought Huawei clusters would be able to compete with Nvidia, etc. Of course, doing new things is always tricky, and 2-5 years certainly sounds plausible to me.

          • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re producing these 7 nm and 5 nm chips on ASML machines they bought or smuggled into the country. The problem is they can’t fix them on warranty if they break and they can’t figure out how to reverse engineer them yet. I’m hopefully but I’m realistic.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re not doing that, they’re using an alternative approach to EUV

              • https://lilys.ai/notes/754616
              • https://www.gizmochina.com/2025/04/24/china-quietly-cracks-5nm-without-euv/
              • https://drrobertcastellano.substack.com/p/how-china-is-reaching-5nm-without

Technology@lemmy.ml

technology@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.ml

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 314 users / day
  • 962 users / week
  • 2.06K users / month
  • 6.33K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 43.5K subscribers
  • 5.15K Posts
  • 46.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org