qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldimagemessage-square199linkfedilinkarrow-up1956arrow-down134
arrow-up1922arrow-down1imageWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square199linkfedilink
minus-squareDr. Moose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down2·1 year agoThis is exactly why ipv6 was never widely adopted. There’s too much power in a limited IP pool.
minus-squareDomi@lemmy.secnd.melinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoDefine “widely”. According to Google 46.09% of their traffic is IPv6 and most servers support it. It’s mostly large ISPs dragging their feet.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI think it’s just a few domestic US ISPs. The rest of the world has been happily using it for quite some time.
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI’ve never seen functional ipv6 except at university, and I would only consider gci large in terms of coverage area and price.
This is exactly why ipv6 was never widely adopted. There’s too much power in a limited IP pool.
Define “widely”.
According to Google 46.09% of their traffic is IPv6 and most servers support it. It’s mostly large ISPs dragging their feet.
I think it’s just a few domestic US ISPs. The rest of the world has been happily using it for quite some time.
I’ve never seen functional ipv6 except at university, and I would only consider gci large in terms of coverage area and price.