• shoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Right, so everything you said is hot air. If you’re not going to bother defending your position and applying it to a simple non-hypothetical situation then I guess you concede that it’s bunk. Clearly you’re interested enough to repeatedly assert that you’re right, but just saying “gaslighting” and “strawman” isn’t convincing anyone.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Congratulations on proclaiming yourself the victor of whatever this was! It’s quite fitting that in the end you have decided not just to put words in my mouth, but indeed have chosen to decide the opinion of all future readers as well

      • shoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You: “I don’t think the small team argument holds any water, [lists examples of popular minimalist indie games, argues for cutting scope and following their style]”

        Me: “My project, at the modest scale I designed with my resource restrictions, was only possible by using Gen Ai to speed development of some assets”

        You: “No you’re wrong, that’s not what I said, you’re a shill, gaslighting, strawman, narrative framing, etc…”

        If you’re not defending your argument at all, I’m going to interpret your position as not worth defending.

        • Carnelian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          After all this time friend, you still have me confused with someone that cares about your interpretation of events?