• Higgs boson@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I dont think that is especially controversial.

    Skin-on-skin time is not only beneficial for the baby. Parents need bonding time (read: oxytocin) with the infant so they dont smother it when the little asshole wakes them up for the 500th time, screaming for no apparent reason.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      My wife and I theorize that babies start smiling at around 2-3 months because that’s about the time that new parent adrenaline wears off, and if they didn’t start smiling the human race would’ve been collectively dropped off at the nearest bear’s den.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hahaha, absolutely the same theory here. Every time you are at the breaking point they do something new and cute.

        Until puberty hits. Then god has mercy on one’s soul.