• 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.comdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i agree with this but this isn’t the reality of the arch ecosystem. AUR is explicitly promoted on the wiki for a large amount of tasks the average user is going to do. it feels skeevy to acknowledge the problems with the AUR and then abscond arch’s responsibility for them, because the AUR is not like PPAs or anything. it is significantly more integrated into the ecosystem.

      • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.comdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you (rhetorical you, not you) can recommend not using the AUR officially all you want. it doesn’t mean anything if a large number of tasks the average user is going to do require AUR packages. i’m kind of drunk rn but i’ll go find specific pages of the wiki that demonstrate what i’m talking about, i stg this isn’t nothing. the core system itself can entirely be managed with pacman, yes, but the average user is going to be doing a lot more than just that. there is a certain discord in the messaging of arch as a whole.

        this is exactly my point. arch can either be a nuts and bolts distro or it can be made for normies. it can’t be both.

        • elo13@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          it doesn’t mean anything if a large number of tasks the average user is going to do require AUR packages

          You keep saying this but can you give any concrete examples? I don’t recall coming across anything like this.