• rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Legal yeah, but it doesn’t stop … thousands? tens of thousands? of random porn sites. There’s no shortage of community driven porn at the moment. Federated solutions only seem to pop up when there’s sufficient non-legal censorship of community-driven content.

    • huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A Foss and federated alternative to onlyfans is more achievable I guess, because pornhub nowadays has to verify the owner of the content.

    • cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The problem with the federated model for porn is that it’s easier to get away with hosting illegal content.

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Using something like PeerTube is potentially even worse because let’s say you unknowingly open a video where someone in it looks of age but technically isn’t. You as a user help propagate that content while you have it open. You’re not just downloading illegal content at that point. You’re actively sharing it to new people.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You as a user help propagate that content while you have it open.

          I’m sure that’s a legal grey area that hasn’t been explored largely but I would think you would have to actually host the content or have it on your device locally.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        A single instance is not federated by itself. It requires multiple instances to be considered a federation.

        Just a little nitpick.