Data privacy is all the rage and people want to have an internet where companies need permission to sell your data and where you can use the FREE service without letting them tell advertisers what you actually like.

There are only 2 possible models for the internet

  1. A free internet where websites, browsers and search engines make money by selling your data to companies who want to sell their products to users.

  2. A subscription based internet where you companies don’t use your data but charge a fee to use a specific website, browser or search engine.

I can guarantee that all these people complaining about “muh privacy” would not like having a paywall restricted internet.

  • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    You have a lot of faith in the US government’s willingness to solve problems for people vs for companies.

    We have a gun violence epidemic because gun manufacturer profits matter more than children’s lives. Forgive me if I’m skeptical that congress would do anything other than protect big business. Health insurance lobbyists will make sure of it.

    • Sackeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have faith in the states/city I live in lol. Maryland/DC will ban the practice, probably the while North east VA upwards, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, West coast, Colorado, and New Mexico would stop this, the feds MIGHT but probably not.

      • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        The health insurance lobbyists won’t hesitate to inject money into a local election for a candidate that agrees to keep things as they are.

        But hey, I remember being naive and idealistic once, too.