I mean. You expected better of them? For some reason dems and gop sux Isreal hard. Probably the nice donations. I know Booker got 1 mil.
If 2 products have the same calories then you check the next line. Like sugar to see which is better. Its the same with the gop and dnc. Both sides are the same there so have to look at other topics. Don’t tell me its cold as f$#! I know that. Which is why I want dems to get theirs but we need gop out first to stop the major pushes right.
GOP are better on Ukraine than the Democrats are, at least admitting the reality of the situation - that it was a proxy war they lost and they now need to extract themselves from it. Democrats are still in kookoo land on this subject.
So if we’re calling both American ruling parties support for a genocidal ethnostate a wash, since they both do it equally, and arbitrarily picking other topics instead why don’t we use this criteria to argue the GOP are the “harm reduction” candidates since they won’t zealously lead us into WW3 and nuclear war?
(I am not advocating voting for the GOP, just using an example to show you the flaw in your logic here)
If you support Ukraine you should support their immediate surrender because they have lost and you dragging this out is just killing thousands of them for no reason and making their situation worse by the day.
Your entire logic is “lesser of 2 evils” right?
The two choices with Ukraine is to keep pushing military support until their country collapses and hundreds of thousands more soldiers die, or surrender and take a deal where they disarm and stay neutral.
The DNC is pushing the wholesale extermination of an entire nation in order to expand a fascist ethnostate, but “anti-science stuff” is your line?
I mean. You expected better of them? For some reason dems and gop sux Isreal hard. Probably the nice donations. I know Booker got 1 mil.
If 2 products have the same calories then you check the next line. Like sugar to see which is better. Its the same with the gop and dnc. Both sides are the same there so have to look at other topics. Don’t tell me its cold as f$#! I know that. Which is why I want dems to get theirs but we need gop out first to stop the major pushes right.
GOP are better on Ukraine than the Democrats are, at least admitting the reality of the situation - that it was a proxy war they lost and they now need to extract themselves from it. Democrats are still in kookoo land on this subject.
So if we’re calling both American ruling parties support for a genocidal ethnostate a wash, since they both do it equally, and arbitrarily picking other topics instead why don’t we use this criteria to argue the GOP are the “harm reduction” candidates since they won’t zealously lead us into WW3 and nuclear war?
(I am not advocating voting for the GOP, just using an example to show you the flaw in your logic here)
Mostly cause I support Ukraine and gop give up stance is ridiculous and apeasrment is bs. I hope if Canada invades Vermont gop just gives up.
If you support Ukraine you should support their immediate surrender because they have lost and you dragging this out is just killing thousands of them for no reason and making their situation worse by the day.
Your entire logic is “lesser of 2 evils” right?
The two choices with Ukraine is to keep pushing military support until their country collapses and hundreds of thousands more soldiers die, or surrender and take a deal where they disarm and stay neutral.
Guess which one is the “lesser evil”?
No, but you seem to not be bothered by it.
Unless they’re anti gay or anti science? You said that was a line for you