How does it work then? I see lot’s pf people claiming to know how it works… only to not actually know how the training works exactly, only a superficial understanding.
How is access limited and at the same time you are bullying everyday Joes who are actually using it?
Ah yes, because people in 3rd world countries earning $1 an hour or less to label that data for the image gen can 100% afford the $10/month for a subscription or a pc to run locally.
Delete all software and turn off your computer or be a hypocrite.
How so?
The stuff they use for training is free for any artist to train on.
The fact that you think AI training and humans looking at thinks are the same thing tells me you don’t know how humans art nor how machines train.
You don’t own the definition of art and nobody you will encounter in a post of any sort is even doing it for major profit.
True. However, this argument should not be about semantics;
I got news for ya.
You don’t own the definition of art.
This is not about definitions, I won’t spend time arguing semantics with you. Also, why re-state yourself?
AI is for everyone, but is made for the rich to get richer, like literally everything else you see or do online
Without social development, all forms of technological development will do nothing but allow for greater forms of torment.
The fact that you think humans don’t use neural networks trained by experience to generate art (or anything else we do) tells me you don’t know how humans art nor how machines train.
![[Rusty Creates] 'Artists'](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ee6ccbcc-d001-4b28-a88f-d39c2b75f860.png){kind=link}
How does it work then? I see lot’s pf people claiming to know how it works… only to not actually know how the training works exactly, only a superficial understanding.
Ah yes, because people in 3rd world countries earning $1 an hour or less to label that data for the image gen can 100% afford the $10/month for a subscription or a pc to run locally.
How so?
The fact that you think AI training and humans looking at thinks are the same thing tells me you don’t know how humans art nor how machines train.
This is not about definitions, I won’t spend time arguing semantics with you. Also, why re-state yourself?
Without social development, all forms of technological development will do nothing but allow for greater forms of torment.
The fact that you think humans don’t use neural networks trained by experience to generate art (or anything else we do) tells me you don’t know how humans art nor how machines train.