Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1936arrow-down134
arrow-up1902arrow-down1imageAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldPharmacokinetics@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 day agoMaybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”. Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·23 hours agoImmediate scenario that came to mind here is The client demanded any other public defender, as long as they weren’t black or female.
Maybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”.
Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
Immediate scenario that came to mind here is