Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoHehsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1829arrow-down118 cross-posted to: mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1811arrow-down1imageHehsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square47fedilink cross-posted to: mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squarePelicanen@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoIf they are oppositely charged particles, I would expect that there is a force of attraction acting on them, yes.
minus-squareLimitless_screaming@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI am not saying that’s wrong, just that there’s 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges not -21.6N.
minus-squareBene7rddso@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoNo, if the force is negative it acts in the opposite direction
minus-squarePelicanen@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoYes, and a force acting in the opposite direction of the distance is an attractive force.
If they are oppositely charged particles, I would expect that there is a force of attraction acting on them, yes.
I am not saying that’s wrong, just that there’s 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges not -21.6N.
But those are the same thing.
No, if the force is negative it acts in the opposite direction
Yes, and a force acting in the opposite direction of the distance is an attractive force.