TechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 years agoWould you agree?programming.devimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down13
arrow-up118arrow-down1imageWould you agree?programming.devTechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarezagaberoo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoIt’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.
minus-squarehellishharlot@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoMaking money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoI’m still waiting for someone to propose in detail an alternative.
minus-squareargv_minus_one@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoYeah, that’s the problem. We don’t have the requisite technology to build a Star Trek utopia. If only we did…
It’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.
Making money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish
I’m still waiting for someone to propose in detail an alternative.
Yeah, that’s the problem. We don’t have the requisite technology to build a Star Trek utopia. If only we did…
Well, if everything ran Linux…