I don’t think it should be legal to anonymously create a facebook, instagram,X,tiktok,reddit account. Without having accounts traceable back to an identify illegal behavior never stops and the person is never held accountable. Online crimes but are unenforceable as long as anonymity is permitted. There is little to no good that comes from anonymously creating an account compared to the massive amounts of harm. Implementing restrictions does not affect 99.99% of the population and only filters out the tiny minority of people who represent a disproportional amount of harm on the platform.

I still think anonymity should be permitted on tor, i2p and less popular sites.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Yeah many folk have a problem with ubiquitous cameras in the public space. I think we just disagree here. If you are fine with cameras then yeah you are going to be fine with this online solution. People like myself are not fine with it at all.

    • Auth@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Then you can go into the schizo bucket. Most people are fine with it some may not like it but they accept it is necessary to reduce risk of crime. No one worries like oh no someone is spying on me through the CCTV no one has time for that and no one cares enough about you to do so.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        or schizo is thinking they know what everyone thinks. I guess you only had one nay sayer given your reply. Oh wait I looked through the post and you have many people disagree. So by no one and most you really mean im going to say whatever I want and be disengenous.

        • Auth@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          im sorry I dont look at a comment section of 20 people and think thats representative of the average population. it could be 100 people disagreeing in there and its still off by 10000000x. We know average people are fine with it because most of the time they are the ones putting these cameras up.

            • Auth@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              People rarely take them down. Maybe you get some schizo kid who does but most people dont feel the need to.

              • HubertManne@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                yeah I think you have been out of the loop news wise. people have been canceling flock and finding they still are collecting crap and taking out or disabling them.

                • Auth@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  You think that because people are taking down flock cameras in parts of the US it applies to CCTV in public spaces all around the world? Am I suppose to read those and think “wow I guess people have finally woken up and started valuing privacy in public spaces”

                  • HubertManne@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    25 days ago

                    you were the one who suggested because people put them up. that implies individuals. public ones have never been popular with people but sure are with governments.