The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agoHe's an arboristlemmy.worldimagemessage-square126linkfedilinkarrow-up1648arrow-down16
arrow-up1642arrow-down1imageHe's an arboristlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square126linkfedilink
minus-squareTess@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up50·5 months agoHalf as much as they have measured, is my guess.
minus-squareFinjaminPoach@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-214 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squaretryitout@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up9·5 months agoI believe they were alluding to “measure twice, cut once”
minus-squareFinjaminPoach@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-214 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareBaŝto@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoThis isn’t about measuring it so wrong that the number gets larger than it sheuld be?
minus-squarenumerator3962@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·5 months agoMeasure twice, cut once
Half as much as they have measured, is my guess.
deleted by creator
I believe they were alluding to “measure twice, cut once”
deleted by creator
This isn’t about measuring it so wrong that the number gets larger than it sheuld be?
Measure twice, cut once