The people who need cars won’t buy these. Not everyone needs every feature. That’s like complaining about lack of an on site gym. If that’s important to you, find a place that has it.
I can name five people who don’t have a car and are happy. Can you name five people who don’t have electricity and are happy? Or will you admit that your point is a bit exaggerated?
That seems entirely dependent on where you live. Some cities make it real easy to live without a car, but most don’t and every city in WA outside of Seattle (2.5hrs from the city in this article) is just the same.
How do you figure? You specifically bolded “in places that don’t need them” in a reply to my “some cities make it easy to go without a car but most don’t” which sounds like you’re in agreement that some cities can do without cars. Vancouver, WA is not one of those cities.
do you see how replying to “every city in WA except of Seattle doesn’t make it real easy to live without a car, and the city in the article is very much outside of Seattle” with “you can’t read, i was just talking about places that don’t need them” makes one think you’re saying that “the city in the article is not one of the places that don’t need them”?
Just because your lifestyle requires a car doesn’t mean everyone’s does. I would love less parking lots, less roads with cars on them, less car infrastructure in general. You can have your infrastructure in your suburbs, let us have ours in our cities.
That’s like “saving time” by not installing electricity or smoke alarms. What a boondoggle; especially in car-dependent America!
The people who need cars won’t buy these. Not everyone needs every feature. That’s like complaining about lack of an on site gym. If that’s important to you, find a place that has it.
I can name five people who don’t have a car and are happy. Can you name five people who don’t have electricity and are happy? Or will you admit that your point is a bit exaggerated?
deleted by creator
That seems entirely dependent on where you live. Some cities make it real easy to live without a car, but most don’t and every city in WA outside of Seattle (2.5hrs from the city in this article) is just the same.
deleted by creator
So it sounds like we’re in agreement that they are needed in Vancouver, WA.
How do you figure? You specifically bolded “in places that don’t need them” in a reply to my “some cities make it easy to go without a car but most don’t” which sounds like you’re in agreement that some cities can do without cars. Vancouver, WA is not one of those cities.
deleted by creator
do you see how replying to “every city in WA except of Seattle doesn’t make it real easy to live without a car, and the city in the article is very much outside of Seattle” with “you can’t read, i was just talking about places that don’t need them” makes one think you’re saying that “the city in the article is not one of the places that don’t need them”?
can’t you just explain I’ve got no idea what you’re saying either
flippancy is just the progressive version of virtue signaling—it gets nobody else on your side
deleted by creator
Just because your lifestyle requires a car doesn’t mean everyone’s does. I would love less parking lots, less roads with cars on them, less car infrastructure in general. You can have your infrastructure in your suburbs, let us have ours in our cities.
are these causing oversupply that could be reclaimed for other things?