More than any other newspaper I know it attracts the most confidently vapid readers, and the political blindspots of the newspaper are as big as the Iraq War.
More than any other newspaper I know it attracts the most confidently vapid readers, and the political blindspots of the newspaper are as big as the Iraq War.
As a straight slot in replacement I would say The Guardian has far less existential blindspots to its coverage, I would recommend a whole mix though.
I am not saying The Guardian doesn’t have issues, it is rather that the New York Times regularly platforms and helps normalize truly ideologically unserious, dangerous beliefs without differentiating it from journalism based in reality. In general, The Guardian is far less likely to do that.