SSTF@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoAdministrative task managementlemmy.worldimagemessage-square100linkfedilinkarrow-up1530arrow-down150
arrow-up1480arrow-down1imageAdministrative task managementlemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square100linkfedilink
minus-square☂️-@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoi legitimately don’t see it. i figured the calendar would not make any sense but the worst i see is jpeg.
minus-squareJetpackJackson@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-223 hours agoIt has too much jpeg on the year numbers imo compared to the month name, March is clear but the year looks like 1/958
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoNot how March was in 1998 or 1999. Also the shadow leading from the firearm along the arm is also bogus.
minus-squareTower@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoThat’s absolutely March of '99. There’s a legitimate question as to whether the calendar says 1999, given all the jpeg, but it did exist.
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoDerp I’d checked 1998 and then didnt check 1999 after I saw the shadow.
minus-square☂️-@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoit’s insane we have to cross reference calendars to figure it out now.
i legitimately don’t see it. i figured the calendar would not make any sense but the worst i see is jpeg.
It has too much jpeg on the year numbers imo compared to the month name, March is clear but the year looks like 1/958
Not how March was in 1998 or 1999. Also the shadow leading from the firearm along the arm is also bogus.
That’s absolutely March of '99. There’s a legitimate question as to whether the calendar says 1999, given all the jpeg, but it did exist.
Derp I’d checked 1998 and then didnt check 1999 after I saw the shadow.
it’s insane we have to cross reference calendars to figure it out now.