So I asked my friends on the RetroDECK team if they’d be open to me asking them a few questions about their latest update (which is a full rewrite of RetroDECK), and they were more than happy to.

For context, RetroDECK is a Flatpak-distributed retro gaming platform designed to bundle clients, multi-emulators, game engines, tools, ports and emulators into a single, self-contained application. Built around the ES-DE frontend and targeting platforms like the Steam Deck and desktop Linux, its aim is simple in concept: make endless retro gaming easy to install, easy to remove, and easy to maintain, without requiring users to manually piece together emulators, dependencies, and configurations.

I’ve used RetroDECK for years now on my Steam Deck, and absolutely swear by it over the alternatives. I love their work, and definitely encourage you to try it if you haven’t already :)

Anyway, if you’re interested in the details on what went into it, you can read my little article on it here with this link. In a day or two I’ll be sharing the full ‘interview’ (it was shortish, by my own standards) with the team as well.

Here’s a little edit, my full questions and answers with the devs is available to read with the following link:

https://gardinerbryant.com/retrodeck-thtalking-about-their-bigget-update-yet/

    • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      RetroDeck doesn’t leave crap all over your system and cleans up after itself.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      RetroDeck has the advantage of being a Flatpak and not needing Deckyloader plugin if you’re using a Steam Deck.

      I’ve had a great experience with it👍

        • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          So what? How much bigger is it than the other one?

          If it allows me to not change too many things on the Deck to install, I’m okay with wasting some space compared to other solutions.

          Also it can emulate not just one console.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That’s nice but for me if a software is also available as a Flatpak it’s an advantage for people that use Flatpak. If it’s available only as a Flatpak (which this one is) it’s a disadvantage for all the people that don’t use it. 2GB for one app is insane. Duckstation is ~80MB

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Most people don’t care as long as it’s not 100 GiB

          The ease of installation, management, and removal is a higher priority for most. Hence, Flatpak is superior for an average Joe.

          Doesn’t hurt to use native options if you like them.