Seefra 1
As always, I got the username wrong…
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
Seefra 1@lemmy.zipto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What are some good "frugal" movie viewing setups? (Recommendations)2·26 days agoIf you are speaking about soundproofing I’m assuming you live in an apartment and have neighbours, I will be making my recommendations based in that assumption.
Also, note that I value audio quality more than video, so if I have a limited budget to setup a home cinema most of it will go to the audio.
For home cinema surround systems are usually the standard, however in my personal and subjective opinion surround adds much to the cost without really proving much value to the experience.
Cheap surround systems like those trendy soundbars will sound like shit comparable to a stereo system for the same price. Yes, they come with a subwoofer so they have bass and provide that wow factor, but you may notice it to be unbalanced the middle or upper frequencies to lack clarity.
If you have a small room and plan on watching films just yourself (and maybe an occasional friend)I recommend a setup similar to mine, a small LCD TV (32" or a bit bigger) and a pair of 8" studio monitors.
From my understanding cheap projectors have quite a substandard image quality and brightness, I understand that you prefer a projector for easier transport, but a small TV is also easy to carry it, you can literally carry it in the backsit of a small car. And will look much better than a cheap projector.
So with your given budget you can get a quality TV for about 500 dollars and a quality pair of near field speakers for another 500 dollars.
This is the perfect setup for a single person intimate setup, however fails short when you put multiple people in the room.
However if you have a big room with many people on it then you will need to compromise on quality, a bigger screen, maybe a projector and maybe a pair of loud used pair of HiFi speakers, since studio monitors aren’t really meant to fill the room and 32" TV will look tiny from a sofa.
Seefra 1@lemmy.zipto Technology@lemmy.ml•Breakthrough in Shanghai lab gives voice to thought2·1 month agoInteresting, but this technology seems really scary, imagine being interrogated with a machine that translates thoughts into words, now try not to think of a sandwich.
Lol no, if you only have budget for one mix it should be the one that preserves the most information, if “90%” of the viewers don’t care about the art form they are watching then they don’t have the right to ruin it for the people who do care.
As for music there’s the opposite problem, there’s a problem in the music industry where most modern music is an incomprehensible mess thanks to the loudness wars, where modern music has zero dynamics, high distortion, lack of tangibility and overall boring.
If you listen to a 70s or early 80s recording you will notice that together with greater dynamics, you have better sound quality, definition and tangibility, than modern trash. Independently of what system you listen it on.
But a good mix will translate well no matter what system you have, it will sound good either on a 10000 dollars HiFi system or on some cheap pair of computer speakers.
Seriously tho, personally I don’t understand people who can tolerate watching anything with on a TVs built in speaker, I rather watch 480p with good sound than 4k on a TV speaker, but that’s me.
If I can’t afford a reasonable pair of speakers then a 20 bucks pair of wired headphones can have excellent sound quality. So there’s really no reason to defend a nerfed mix.
With this, I’m not saying that some modern shows don’t exaggerate and that their levels are past ridiculous.
Well, it’s now cinema is supposed to be.
Ideally they could make two mixes, one for serious viewing and good systems and another for bringe watching or bad speakers. But since that would cost more money and isn’t done, a good dynamic mix is preferable because you can always throw a compressor and some limiting to a dynamic mix, but you can’t recover information after it’s lost. And as a film and series enjoyer I don’t want my experience to be nerfed.
As for ads, I have no idea? I haven’t watched an ad since I got internet many years ago. Idk how you’re getting your media, maybe get an adblocker or use torrents?
Because cinema is supposed to be immersive, it’s supposed to take the audience into the action, it’s supposed to make you feel like you’re there. Dynamics play an important part of this.
It’s not enough to acknowledge that there has been an explosion or a monster has screeched, it’s important that the viewer feels in danger, like the monster can actually harm the viewer. To get that adrenaline pumping.
Ofc when your levels are ridiculously exaggerated and you stretch over to the volume control all the time, then the immersion is broken because instead of watching the film you’re too busy riding the fader.
You don’t hate dynamic range, you hate bad mixes, two different things, without dynamics audio sounds like shit. An explosion is supposed to be louder than talking speech.
It’s just not supposed to try to mimic the absurdity of an actual explosion, to the point of discomfort.
Also, like said before in the parent comment, most consumer systems don’t even even have the dynamics to reproduce it without distortion (or damage the woofers).
Technically speaking it’s very easy to implement, it’s just a compressor, oldest thing in audio after maybe the EQ.
VLC has a compressor under effects, if you’re using Linux you can add effects to pulse or pipewire really easy too.
Seefra 1@lemmy.zipto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•If I wanted to bury a hard drive for archival purposes (e.g. Country becoming Dictatorship), how to keep the contents from being damaged and where is the safest place to bury it?81·1 month agoThe issue with hard drives is that they tend to fail even on ideal conditions and even when powered down. Yes I’ve lost very important data to a powered down hard drive.
While it’s possible to recover information on a hard drive as long as the plates themselves aren’t damaged, that requires very expensive specialised tools and skills. Which probably wouldn’t be available in a scenario where the information on the drive would be of any value.
DVD-R (and probably consequentially Blu-Rays) aren’t any better in my experience, I’ve lost more data to DVD-R than to hard drives actually. Even when stored in low light conditions they tend to just stop reading.
However optical media has one big advantage here, is that the discs themselves are cheap, so instead of having all your digital eggs in the same basket, you spread them over several discs and while some information may be lost, others may survive.
Now, here’s an interesting thought, with digital data, the data either reads or doesn’t read, the so called digital cliff, may become partially corrupted and other parts still read, but after the corruption gets past a certain threshold all information is lost.
With analogue equipment even after severe signal degradation the contents while very deteriorated may still be perceptible, forwardermore an analogue signal is much easier to decode in the event that you need to restart
civilisationbuilding tech from scratch and don’t have access to the very very specific specifications of something like the audio codec or the filesystem.You can probably hack a rudimentary cassette player together from very simple components, all you need is a tape head (a coil), a motor (a coil and a magnet), and an amplifier (a transistor or vaccum tube). (I’m probably oversimplifying here).
Overall I think the most important thing is having redundancy, or if redundancy isn’t possible at least don’t have all eggs in the same basket, instead of having everything in a single 8TB HDD, to try spread them into smaller 512GB ones, or DVDs or flash drives or all of the above. And don’t store them all in the same location, if an area gets flooded or someone builds a building on top, you’re only losing a small part of the information.
I personally would throw the dishwasher away, and before that, permanently damage it to make sure no poor soul picks it up from the trash thinking they scored a free dishwasher without knowing it was once used to wash literal shit.
I would never be able to ever eat anything from any dish every washed on that machine, but again, that’s me and my personal emotional reaction to it. I understand that if it reaches 90C it technically kills all bacteria or something. But I would still refuse.
For that same reason I never buy used kitchen utensils, because I have no way to know what has be used for before.
Seefra 1@lemmy.zipto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Unneccessary long context menus on YouTube MusicEnglish6·1 month agoAnd they are still missing the most important menu item “Stop after this track”
If you were the one being underpaid to do his job, you would do the same.
Seefra 1@lemmy.zipto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•If you had 1 dollar and 24 hours what would you do?2·1 month agoI can’t think of many things you can buy for a dollar, maybe a bottle of water and 2 pieces of bread.
Chewing gum maybe, back in the days those were cheap, doubt that’s still the case.
Photocopies, those are cheap, you can get like 7 copies with 1 dollar.
Can’t think of anything else, really.
Also earning more? That’s not possible, unless you’re willing to beg, but then that’s completely unrelated to your initial dollar.
Seefra 1@lemmy.zipto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•introducing copyparty, the FOSS file serverEnglish2·2 months agoOMG! I’ve been looking for something like this for quite some time!
I will try this as soon as I have time. Thank you!
“Mice do not have a special appetite for cheese, and will eat it only for lack of better options; they actually favor sweet, sugary foods. The myth may have come from the fact that before the advent of refrigeration, cheese was usually stored outside and was therefore an easy food for mice to reach.”
Source