Tbh all I care about is low dependencies and performance, dunno if that’d help

I worked hard to make it this unreadable

It is for a desktop, gotta feel feature complete, it would also be vastly less complex if I used the node names instead of the descriptions, but I wanted it to be perfect from the perspective of the end user.

I don’t like doing that because i’m working on nixos which already makes it complicated but i also have a script that fully sets up my entire system and that would add some complexity to that, plus i just have a strange aversion to making it a bash script purely because it would be the only common function in my setup that’s on a bash script

and it wouldn’t be that hard to convert it to one for future debugging anyway

you could make it cli only by replacing tofi with a cli menu

That’s tofi, the dmenu alternative I’m using, I set its height and width, the oga is a media file, that plays the same ding as a volume change so you know what sink you’re playing from now.

feel free to replace tofi with dmenu or whatever

I highly recommend mull and learning how to use vopono, it’s an incredible combination.

But it was totally fair for god to do that in the past because morals and ethics… have changed… whoops.

Is it really actually more simple, or is this a situation of you being accustomed to one thing and thus percieving it as simple?

interesting, thank you.

It really is spotify’s killer feature for me, probably won’t switch to something that doesn’t have it.

Spotify has a feature where if it is playing on another device, you can control it with any other device logged into the account, is there any good way to replicate this with a linux desktop and an android phone?

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeshh

…devout??

Just use cosmic on another distro?

They’ve fixed the fov (although maybe I used a mod) input latency was better than before but still not perfect.

Please include an easter egg that leads to this post, thank you

It does not reduces maintenance.

It absolutely does, package maintainers just have to maintain ONE package for all distros.

And it costs hard drive, and with heavy use, probably ram too

This isn’t performance really, it’s storage, and I don’t think it actually impacts ram.

Maintenance is only reduced on the surface level. The complexity you don’t see as a problem is the actual maintenance problem. It’s not a problem only if you’re not the one dealing with integration, maintenance or security.

This is a case you’re going to have to try a lot harder to make, I don’t see what you’re saying at all.

But this one in particular vastly reduces maintenance, doesn’t do anything at all to performance, and only arguably adds complexity, I think it needs to be case by case.

It’s just a weird linux distro that you install atop your distro, honestly, I have no idea why you think that.